Wednesday, March 16, 2011

foreclosure law


We pointed last week to an analysis by Lynn Syzmoniak that showed that foreclosures across a number of different servicers were way down in January 2011 versus the same period in January 2010. This was admittedly a tally in only two Florida counties, but she indicated that a quick look at other counties in Florida showed a similar pattern.


So the question then becomes: is this a Florida only development, due perhaps in part the fact that all the big foreclosure mills in the state are under investigation by the state AG and are imploding (as in losing clients and shedding staff)? Or is this a broader trend due to the robo signing scandal leading judges being more receptive to arguments about chain of title and validity of transfers? Before, the assumption was “bank right, borrower trying to abuse the law to stay in house”. Now more judges, seeing that banks have run roughshod over legal requirements, are prepared to give borrower arguments a hearing. That forces banks to up their game, which in turn may be the real driver for this apparent slowdown in foreclosure actions. If that was the main driver in Florida, we’d expect to see similar patterns in other states.


We are seeing analogous developments, but the drivers appear to be state specific, as judges give adverse rulings on common practices in foreclosure land. Reader wc4d pointed to a report in the Portland Oregonian, that lenders are withdrawing cases because five court decisions have found that lenders that used MERS violated state recording laws.


This is a vivid illustration of a point made in an article on MERS yesterday by Gretchen Morgenson:


MERS was flawed at conception, those critics say. The bankers who midwifed its birth hired Covington & Burling, a prominent Washington law firm, to research their proposal. Covington produced a memo that offered assurances that MERS could operate legally nationwide. No one, however, conducted a state-by-state study of real estate laws.


“They didn’t do the deep homework,” said an official involved in those discussions who spoke on condition of anonymity because he has clients involved with MERS. “So as far as anyone can tell their real theory was: ‘If we can get everyone on board, no judge will want to upend something that is reasonable and sensible and would screw up 70 percent of loans.’ ”


As we’ve also noted, recording clerks in single counties in Massachusetts and North Carolina are looking into how to recover recording fees from MERS, but the cost of litigation means they’d need other counties in the same states to join or the state attorney general to take up the matter. By contrast, the Oregon decisions don’t hit small fry MERS; they are a big problem for the banks themselves. As the Oregonian reports:


Sales of hundreds of foreclosed homes in Oregon have been halted or withdrawn in recent weeks after federal judges repeatedly questioned their legality, according to a number of real estate attorneys in the state.


Lenders have withdrawn more than 300 foreclosure sales since February in Deschutes County alone, one of the Oregon area’s hardest hit by the housing collapse. About 130 of those notices were filed in the past week, attorneys say.


Dozens of foreclosure listings by ReconTrust Co., the foreclosure arm of Bank of America Corp., have disappeared from its website, attorneys say…


Since October, federal judges in five separate Oregon cases have halted foreclosures involving MERS, saying its participation caused lenders to violate the state’s recording law. Three of those decisions came last month, the key one in U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Eugene.


Attorneys say it’s not clear whether lenders in Oregon will simply start over or head to court to foreclose, steps that could prolong the crisis for months and drive up costs, attorneys say. Some suggest lenders might not have access to the documents they need to comply with state law.


“A lot of us are questioning whether there is a solution,” said David Ambrose, a Portland attorney who represents lenders in mortgage transactions. “It’s pretty amazing. There are a lot of unanswered questions.” ….


In Oregon, lenders can foreclose without going to court. But state law also requires that the loan’s ownership history, or assignments, be recorded with local county governments before proceeding with a nonjudicial foreclosure.


In the Eugene court case, Donald E. McCoy III filed for bankruptcy protection in part to block U.S. Bank from foreclosing on his Central Point home. He then sued the bank and MERS, along with his original lender BNC Mortgage Inc., claiming they had not properly recorded BNC’s subsequent sale of the loan to investors.


Chief Bankruptcy Judge Frank R. Alley III found McCoy’s allegation persuasive and refused to grant the bank’s request for a dismissal.


“Oregon law permits foreclosure without the benefit of judicial proceeding only when the interest of the beneficiary (lender) is clearly documented in a public record,” Alley wrote. “When the public record is lacking, the foreclosing beneficiary must prove its interest in a judicial proceeding.”


This looks like an epic fail for the banks, at least in Oregon. To save maybe $50 on recording fees, they are now going to have to go to court to foreclose. And worse for them will be cases where the records don’t pass muster. Recall that servicers advance principal and interest to investors when borrowers become delinquent. They then reimburse themselves out of the foreclosure proceeds. No foreclosure and they are out a lot of dough.


As Morgenson’s source indicated, the banks brazenly assumed that the courts would simply roll over rather than block the extra-legal imposition of a new system. But there is enough of a semblance of rule of law in the US to undermine all the cost savings and corners-cutting they engaged in. Recall this recent New York decision:


This court does not accept the argument that because MERS may be involved with 50 percent of all residential mortgages in the country, that is reason enough for this court to turn a blind eye to the fact that this process does not comply with the law.


The courts are delivering the banks an unrelenting series of deserved unkind cuts. This is getting to be interesting, and for a change, in a good way.






Comments


Please use the comments to demonstrate your own ignorance, unfamiliarity with empirical data, ability to repeat discredited memes, and lack of respect for scientific knowledge. Also, be sure to create straw men and argue against things I have neither said nor even implied. Any irrelevancies you can mention will also be appreciated. Lastly, kindly forgo all civility in your discourse . . . you are, after all, anonymous.


8 Responses to “Stern Foreclosure Mill Closing”







  1. Barry Ritholtz Says:



    March 7th, 2011 at 2:56 pm

    I find it amusing that I am the first Tweet on this








  2. ashpelham2 Says:



    March 7th, 2011 at 2:57 pm

    Mr. Ritholtz, didn’t you predict something like this last week? Would you like to spend a weekend in Atlantic City? :D








  3. curbyourrisk Says:



    March 7th, 2011 at 3:50 pm

    Here’s to hoping your cellmate is a Big Ass Bad MOFO who had his conjugal visits stripped away from him years ago……


    mmmm…fresh meat!!!!








  4. doug Says:



    March 7th, 2011 at 3:59 pm

    BR, if you follow your tweet link, the browser ‘back’ arrow is somewhat disabled, trapping you in tweetworld.

    I call douche baggery by the tweet folks…


    And yes on the ‘hoped for’ cell mate for Stern








  5. jaymaster Says:



    March 7th, 2011 at 4:25 pm

    I’m a bit offended by your use of the term “douche bag”.


    By associating the term with such an unsavory character, you are perpetuating a negative perception of a perfectly useful product.


    And some of your foreign readers might conflate the term with the more offensive European phrase “Deutsche Bank”.








  6. rktbrkr Says:



    March 7th, 2011 at 6:25 pm

    He should have stayed NBA commish…








  7. Barry Ritholtz Says:



    March 7th, 2011 at 6:37 pm

    LOL


    That’s Very funny








  8. Greg0658 Says:



    March 8th, 2011 at 8:47 am

    I wiki’d that too “NBA commish” unrelated & not 1 in the same

    (unless the database has been tampered with)












Leave a Reply



You must be logged in to post a comment.





BenchCraft, LLC announced that it will debut its Concert Series, a fresh line of recliners with an integrated sound product, at Great Position Industry on October 17-22, 2009. Concert Series recliners element two built-in stereo speakers and also a subwoofer built specially to make a complete variety of sound. It's got tactile motors that may possibly vibrate with all the sound or be utilized independently being a massage technique, and separate controls that allow for person adjustments to become designed to the volume, bass/treble, as well as the tactile/massage function. The technique, which will have a beginning price tag level of $699, may also comprise a mini audio jack so users can connect to their a variety of audio resources (i.e. iPods, MP3 gamers, cell phones, and so forth.). To that finish, Sinning noted that Berkline will also be introducing in pick motion
bench craft company reviews
furnishings its new eCoupled technological innovation option--a wireless charging station for electronic products like cell phones, MP3 players, and laptops. Designed by Fulton Innovation, it eliminates the desire for energy cords by making an electromagnetic conduit combined with an intelligent command model that regularly monitors energy movement so a range of devices from distinct manufactures can charge simultaneously. eCoupled know-how can also be protected for digital gadgets since it allows for only the quantity of power
bench craft company reviews
desired to maintain a machine at peak vitality amounts, so there may be no risk of overcharging. While the quantity of units compatible with this particular engineering is restricted, Berkline expects that a lot more and much more manufacturers will move toward incorporating the ability to connect for the eCoupled function

The Bench Craft Company gives you no excuses for the really difficult effort and perseverance that they commit themselves to so as to maintain themselves because the leader in nationwide onsite golf course property
bench craft company reviews
advertising. No excuses for providing their purchasers using the most comprehensive coverage for his or her bench craft company reviews marketing dollar regardless of whether it be locally or nationwide. No excuses for supplying golf program properties quite possibly the most seamless system for generating excess revenue from the most non-intrusive way, while enhancing the top quality of your amenities combined with the working experience of their golfers on their house. Bench Craft is committed to being the very best and the greatest at what they do, promoting on golf program bench craft company reviews venues.
In an age where no one
bench craft company reviews
wishes to take obligation for anything at all, Bench Craft helps make by itself entirely accountable for your achievements of their advertising purchasers, which can be why their consumers and very well as Bench Craft constantly practical knowledge wholesome development prices and profit margins. A provider are unable to be any longer
bench craft company reviews
flourishing than their buyer, so it happens to be mission of Bench Craft for making specific that each individual consumer gets the most beneficial feasible venue for presenting their clientele
bench craft company reviews
merchandise and providers, irrespective of whether it be locally or nationally. This dedication to top notch is what sets Bench Craft apart from its competition, and dollar for dollar can make its promoting products many of the most beneficial during the community.
The golf courses bench craft company reviews that Bench Craft Company will work in concert with, get providers and products at no amount. Bench Craft Company product sales group instantly money this product for each golf program by getting sponsors for every merchandise. Nearby vendors and players from the neighborhood receive sponsorship priority and golf program management functions closely with Bench Craft to realize prospective sponsors. Bench Craft’s really profitable
bench craft company reviews
model offers golf courses a totally free of cost substitute that also eliminates expenditures hence of layout changes, program modifications, theft and vandalism.
As staying a definite additional benefit, just about every course is secured beneath a $3,000,000 liability policy. The organization can accommodate basically every single golf course. At the same time, Bench Craft Company performs collectively with all branches of your Armed Forces, and even state, county and town golf courses. This collection of golf programs offers Bench Craft’s buyers with all the most comprehensive coverage of golf course properties while in the United states.
The ahead
bench craft company reviews
thinking Visionaries at Bench Craft Company designed a approach that garners the focus and participation of not just its personal product sales workers, but the sponsors, golf program management as well as the membership and patrons. There’s only one Bench Craft Company, do not fall for rip off plots by imposters working a scam.
bench craft company reviews




No comments:

Post a Comment